That "this lesson that is going through is leading us to profound change!"

 "Nothing will ever be the same!"

 "We will value the fragility of the human condition and therefore we will respect it!"  , etc.

 It is not surprising the absence of historical memory especially if you are scared, crying out to your god, even if it is in lower case, more serious if it is in capital letters.  Shares sharply on the rise of faith sellers with their "paidofilias" (to put it mildly), banks, and the like.

 As in the Twin Towers, a good percentage of "humanity" does not experience it in the same way, but see for example the trends of Twitter "hashtag" in the world and by countries.

 In any case, the "human condition", if there is something like that, since everyone is different and these concepts tend to flatten the differences, not for nothing, the "human condition" generally hangs between the most abject misery and the most sublime greatness  .  And even in the same individual: an executioner, in another scene he is a loving and considerate father.

 What will undoubtedly happen in many places is that finally, in an almost perfect move, they will be able to muzzle people, take them by the rope and release them a little and adjust it a little more.

 "And the thing is that people are dying!"

 We exclaimed hysterically, undoubtedly more concerned with our skin than with our freedom.

 Yes, the sun moves, watch it!

 "What! Earth is spinning !?

 Stupid fool!

 And yes, the bad news: people die.  Always.

This macabre game, if they go wrong, and they know it, that's why they're radical, will destroy powers that seem invincible.  But they are not, it is obvious, so the act is desperately planned.  The USSR fell.  Who would have said it in 1985?

 Nothing "has to be this way".  There can always be the surprising, as it is today.

 Where danger is born, what saves is also born.

De las promesas temporales y otros actos de fe.

Que "¡esta lección por la que está pasando nos lleva hacia un cambio profundo!" 

"¡Nada volverá a ser igual!"

"¡Valoraremos la fragilidad de la condición humana y por ello la respetaremos!" , etc.

No es de extrañar la ausencia de memoria histórica sobre todo si estas asustado, clamando así a tu dios, aunque sea con minúsculas, más serio si es con mayúsculas. Las acciones bruscamente en alta de los vendedores de fe con sus "paidofilias" (por decirlo suave), bancos y afines. 

Como en las Torres Gemelas, un buen porcentaje de la "humanidad" no lo vive de igual manera, sino vean por ejemplo las tendencias de "hashtag" de Twitter en el mundo  y por países.

En todo caso, la "condición humana", si hay algo así, pues cada quien es diferente y estos conceptos tienden a achatar las diferencias, no por nada, la "condición humana" generalmente pendula entre la miseria más abyecta y la grandeza más sublime. Y hasta en el mismo individuo: un verdugo, en otra escena es una padre cariñoso y considerado.

Lo que sin duda sucederá en muchos lugares es que por fin, en una jugada casi perfecta, lograrán ponerle el bozal a la gente, tomarlos de la cuerda y liberarlos un poco y ajustarla un tanto más.

"¡Y es que la gente se está muriendo!"

Exclamamos histéricamente sin duda preocupados más por nuestro pellejo que por nuestra libertad.

¡Sí,  el sol se mueve, míralo!

"¡Qué! ¿¡La Tierra gira!?

¡Estúpido, necio!

Y sí, la mala noticia: la gente muere.  Siempre.

Este juego macabro, si les sale mal, y lo saben, por eso son radicales, destruirá a poderes que parecen  invencibles. Pero no lo son, es obvio, por ello el acto planificadamente desesperado. LA URSS cayó. ¿Quién lo hubiera dicho en 1985?

Nada "tiene que ser así". Siempre puede existir lo sorprendente, como es esto hoy.

Ahí donde nace el peligro, nace también lo que salva.

The cocoon of the butterfly.

When someone leaves, what remains has to do with him, but not anymore. Like the cocoon that is abandoned by the butterfly.

I'm not sure what the butterfly is, if it is. But what I am sure of is that the one who left is no longer there and what remains is the cocoon.

 As Constantine Cavafis said in his poem:

 We said goodbye for a week

 I didn't know that those seven days

 They were going to last a lifetime

 You never know

 When are you saying goodbye.

 And this is not to be overwhelmed by grief or anguish.

 On the contrary, it is to appreciate the unrepeatable present, the people and moments that we take for granted.

 The haze is not knowing if you are going to be alive the next minute, if that bombardment is going to hit your shelter;  or that tomorrow they will invade the place where you live and you don't know what will become of you or yours, and it happens, and you die and everything ends or you are a prisoner and your family rejects;  or strangers come and kidnap you and yours, separate you from your people and insolently enslave you;  or you're in your barrack, they say they take them to take a bath, but you realize that something is wrong, you take your daughter's hand and they lead you there until, inside, everyone shudders and twists desperate for the gases  ;  or you walk through a market in Kabul buying your food, when suddenly everything breaks and explodes, with pieces of bodies and screams ..;  Or you see someone sleeping on the street in the doorway, angry, abandoned and the best thing you can think of is taking some photos.

 And you think you have problems and you sink into your little anguish!

La mariposa y el capullo.

Cuando alguien se va, lo que queda tuvo que ver con él, pero ya no. Como el capullo que es abandonado por la mariposa.

No estoy seguro de qué es la mariposa, si es. Pero de lo que estoy seguro es de que, el que se fue, ya no está y lo que queda es el capullo.

Como decía en su poema Constantino Cavafis:

Nos despedimos por una semana

No supe que esos siete días

Iban a durar para toda la vida

Uno nunca sabe

Cuándo está diciendo adiós.

Y esto no es para abrumarse por la pena o la angustia.

Todo lo contrario, es para apreciar el presente irrepetible, a las personas y momentos que damos por sentados.

La bruma es no saber si vas a estar vivo al siguiente minuto, si ese bombardeo va a atinar en tu refugio; o que mañana invadirán el lugar donde vives y no sabes qué será de ti ni de los tuyos, y sucede, y mueres y se acaba todo o eres prisionero y tu familia desecha; o llegan unos extraños y te secuestran a ti y a los tuyos, te separan de tu gente y con insolencia te esclavizan; o estás en tu barraca, dicen que los llevan a darse un baño, pero te das cuenta que algo no va bien, tomas la mano de tu hija y te conducen hacia allá hasta que, dentro, todos se estremecen y retuercen desesperados por los gases; o caminas por un mercado en Kabul comprando tu comida, cuando de pronto todo se quiebra y estalla, con trozos de cuerpos y gritos..; o ves en la calle a alguien durmiendo en un portal, íngrimo, abandonado y lo mejor que se te ocurre es tomarle unas fotos.

¡Y crees que tienes problemas y te hundes en tu pequeña angustia!

From faith sellers and their allies. The evil is inside?



For how long have we psychologists known that we have studied Freud and his antecedents, that suggestion individually achieves not only emotions, but ideas identified as perceptions, that is to say as real, there in the world and in one.

 And that is thanks to the contraptions of the manipulation of what Freud called the system of perception / consciousness, which allows hypnotic states to be generated and their credible, indubitable effects for those who live them.

 This action aimed at influencing perceptions and undoubtedly actions, individually has its form, but in the social field, that same induction program takes on a special power since it is replicated from many positions.  It is no longer just the inductor and its structure, but there are replicants who assume that role as they are also addressed by the slogans.

 I am convinced that Freud would have another look, of suspicion, about this coronavirus, social isolation and its noble causes.  There are his writings on culture.

 But it is as if they were not, at this time when the project of "do not think, consume" is established.  Certainly in a new phase.

 A look of suspicion as Foucault's would be, or Lacan's irony.  Which leads me to say that the world is almost devoid of people who have made their lives and what they have been developing, a consistent reference to think on the other side of the status quo.  Although Foucault questioned the idea of ​​author and work, because this idea supposes a certain voluntarism and forgets that there is a social plot that produces thought.

 Today the social fabric has committed suicide by associating itself with what moves the hello of technology.  They say that they are the innocent algorithms, among other things, that they are there for our good.  So much consideration should worry.

 And just as when we see the magician on television, with a large audience, all extras, the statue of La Libertad disappears "before our eyes" and we wonder in surprise how he did it!  The question itself is naive: it is a trick!

 But there are those who do not see it.

 And in part they don't see it because of the prestige and faith in science.  The new faith with its apostles.

 Those apostles, just as in the ecclesiastical nomenclature, it is not the same to be a village priest than to be a cardinal;  those of us in the major leagues of science, let's open our eyes!  they are mercenaries.

 Who was behind the investigation of toxic gases for warlike uses in the first world war?  Who designed the atomic bombs used in Japan?  Who in their arrogance, who do not care to hide, play with genes for all kinds of things?

 They and the interests that finance them, do you think they do it for the love of knowing?

 Pride that you will lose them.  "Where danger arises, what also saves is born," Heidegger quoted Hölderling, in his question about technology.

 "Evil is within"?

 The proud close relative of indifference.  The absence of questioning his motives.

 Their gadgets that take them seriously, obviously.

 The thread of his power is the same as that of his weakness.

 Simple historical memory: brilliant Leonardo da Vinci is true, however look at his wartime gadget designs.  There is always a gauge and those who allow themselves to be gauged in the name of “science”.

 There will be the naive who see a Prometheus but what I see is Evil;  I do not want to name it so as not to induce a misunderstanding that increases the actions already on the rise, of the sellers of faith who participate in the treat.

 Chaos implies an unclear logic.  We name our inability to explain "chaos": the real as the impossible to be symbolized but which is there as a lack.

 With Plato let's say:

 Quod est videre per speculum in obumbratio.

Corona V: the synthetic virus

The world has new ways of confrontation that we have not yet understood. And partly because mass culture, the mass media, remains strong in other ways.

The conventional sense of one country against another country, with this idea that it is countries that are confronting each other, does not show that they are really interests.

But on the other side of the struggles, there are also great affinities that define agreements.

When you're talking about global capital and interests that go beyond borders that are painted like China or the United States: look at the Nike label and ask yourself where it was made.

So the other scene of governments and the articulations of governments and also the powers that are there, different types of powers: the world is living in times when those confrontations are no longer truly between countries but in relation to the interests of those who they are hegemonic in their general agreements and the mass that has to be led, has to be carried, has to be used and if it is the case, as it has been before, sacrificed.

Furthermore, it must be understood that the Chinese nomenclature has its own project, I repeat, its own project.

But the detail is that the new mass media allows the mass to be led avoiding, if necessary (at another time it could be the opposite) avoiding, I say, the vital sacrifice.

And it is clear that this would seem to affect the economy; But remember that crises are great capital-enhancing elements that also promote "purification".

"Telecommuting," for example, is encouraged, thereby killing more than two birds with one stone: they isolate people in the real and confine them to the virtual controllable; They will save operating costs by improving profitability and force the transition to digital in those areas where it is not consolidated.

On the other hand, that the price of gold rises this month. You just have to see the trend in the year.

The price of gold consolidated around $ 1,400 per ounce in June 2019. Take a good look at the table.

Those who bought gold, the truly few who bought a lot of gold, evidently knew what was going to happen almost a year earlier. These things are planned and are for the curious dates on which they occur. Watch out they become predictable guys. The latter, with the arrogance that they are, will annoy them.



And the futures price of gold as of March, which reached up to $ 1,700 an ounce.



And the fluctuations in this high month, when the price falls, ask why and towards what investment is it directed.

Who has gold?

At the same time that the shares go down. What are the interesting ones to buy on the downside and are they in strategic lines?

I understand that there is already a trend towards a kind of autism in the face of social issues, precisely caused by what is euphemistically called "social networks" that lead to the fact that in a meeting, as in a cartoon, they are embedded in the new silly boxes that are mobile phones, now, thanks to the move of the coronavirus, they promote the phobia of the other, social isolation. Because being out of the network, being in the real world and not in the virtual one does not make them controllable.

 And to think that there was ever "faith" in the "critical mass".  Today we see it: pure dry mass.  And finally everyone keeps looking towards where the first, salaried, began to look.

 We are living that world: there are those who calculate it and many others live it.

 These are the "wars".

 We believe that what we see on the cinema screen is what is there and we do not turn to see the projector.

 It is not wrong to have at least some historical memory.  For example, the alliance opened in its time between the empire and the papacy.  The governments belong to the politicians (papacy) and apart from the economic interests, the hard ones, the real ones, not the local ones but the global ones.

 In China the party nomenclature aspires to both.  So do we better understand Trump and what he stands for in that order?

 In this intention of synthesizing the political and the economic in one, the struggles are presented, as an example of "peaceful" struggles, the confrontation against Huawei of Android ... that is, of Google.

 Politicians usually depend on economic interests and from there they negotiate.  China, USA, Russia have divisions, I repeat, divisions for cyber warfare.  A division is between 10,000 to 15,000 troops in a field that mainly includes algorithms and programs.  It is a lot of people.  Are these people busy or idle?

 Among other things, they create credible profiles on the networks.  They still fail certain details, because they assume that the dough simply follows the carrot.

 I assure you that they're not surprised at the enormous success they have had in this which has been carefully planned by psychopaths, their mercenaries and allies.  And as we know, they are always ready for anything: playing with genes, killing presidents like JFK and a long etc.

 And if, beyond governments, the interests, which for example did not blink at dropping two atomic bombs in cities in the Second World War, when they could have dropped them close enough to be seen, what they needed was to confirm the hypotheses and experiment  .

 The Matrix is ​​not in the future, it is a metaphor for this, today.

 And the future after this, what can be generated from the network and what needs to be identified and controlled, what could it be?

 But I assure you, that will come.  In the meantime, social control when necessary.

 Part of the experiment this time or another would be that the networks collapse and the Darkness effect occurs.

 I repeat, this has not only been social control, it is also taking control of downward actions in strategic areas.

 Well, the digital mass society, with thinking people included, has yielded the analysis.

 This is in part the effect that many universities have turned them into a factory for professionals and taking orders from corporations and the state.  And reflection, rationality has been excluded from them, as they are not profitable.

 To conclude (moral):

 So the Corona V is the subterfuge for the staging of the new war and control in the networks.

 There are those who imagined the third world war as a deployment of intercontinental missiles.

 The idea of ​​confrontation between countries.

 The confrontation is between interests.  But they have reached agreements, except China whose nomenclature aspires to power not only political.

 I conclude: they see the film so well mounted on the screen and it does not occur to them to turn to see the projector.  Leap of faith in the cloud of targeted disinformation.

 36 groups in the world have shed the pandemic by stocking up on gold more than a year ago to buy shares down;  plus the effect of what real wars will be, not intercontinental missiles.

 The Chinese nomenclature wants to own the world clan.

 And they don't joke around, they don't play games.

 But who won?  China:

 "They wanted war, there you have it" 他們 想要 戰爭 ， 那裡 有 戰爭

 Will it be possible to sacrifice a few inclusive and to begin with, for the sake of the "party"?

 Fear and deficiencies.  But the power is from fear.  Let you believe what makes you wait.  The power that can kill.

 It has never been new, the new is the medium.  And that the medium becomes the message, which tells you that in the end (the message) justifies the means.

 As always, the strong will end up being stronger and the fools ...

 It fits the description of Arthur Baer about Christian Wilmore: "He was born an idiot and has had a relapse"

De los vendedores de fe y sus aliados. ¿"El mal está dentro"?

Desde hace cuánto sabemos los psicólogos que hemos estudiado a Freud y sus antecedentes, que la sugestión de modo individual logra no sólo emociones, sino ideas identificadas como percepciones, es decir como reales, ahí en el mundo y en uno.

Y eso gracias a los artilugios de la manipulación de lo que Freud llamaba el sistema de percepción / conciencia, que permite generar estados hipnóticos y sus efectos creíbles, indudables para quienes los viven.

Esa acción encaminada a influenciar percepciones y sin duda acciones,  en lo individual tiene su forma, pero en el campo de lo social, ese mismo programa de inducción, cobra una potencia especial pues es replicado desde muchas posiciones. Ya no es sólo el inductor y su estructura, sino que hay replicantes que asumen ese rol al estar ellos también abordados por las consignas. 

Estoy convencido que Freud tendría otra mirada, de sospecha, sobre  esto del coronavirus, del aislamiento social y sus nobles causas. Ahí están sus escritos sobre la cultura.

Pero es como si no estuvieran, en esta época en la que se instaura el proyecto de "no pienses, consume". Ciertamente en una nueva fase. 

Mirada de sospecha como  sería también la de Foucault, o la ironía de Lacan. Lo que me lleva a decir que el mundo está casi desprovisto de gente que haya hecho de su vida y lo que ha ido elaborando,  una  referencia  consistente para pensar del otro lado del statu quo.  Aunque  Foucault cuestionaba la idea de autor y de obra, pues esta idea supone un cierto voluntarismo y olvida que existe una trama social que produce  pensamiento.

Hoy la trama social se ha suicidado asociándose con lo que mueve la hola de la tecnología. Dicen que son los inocentes algoritmos, entre otras cosas, que están ahí para  nuestro bien. Tanta consideración debería preocupar.

Y así como cuando vemos al mago en la televisión, con un público numeroso, todos extras, desparecer "frente a nuestros ojos" la estatua de La Libertad y nos preguntamos sorprendidos ¡como lo hizo! La pregunta en sí  es ingenua: ¡es un truco!

Pero hay quienes no lo ven.

Y en parte no lo ven por el prestigio y la fe en la ciencia. La nueva fe con sus apóstoles.

Esos apóstoles, así como en la nomenclatura eclesiástica  no es lo mismo ser un cura de pueblo a ser un cardenal; los que están en las las ligas mayores de las ciencias, ¡abramos los ojos! son unos mercenarios.

¿Quiénes estuvieron tras la investigación de gases tóxicos  para usos bélicos en la primera guerra mundial? ¿Quiénes diseñaron las bombas atómicas usadas en Japón? ¿Quiénes en su soberbia, que no se preocupan en disimular, juegan con los genes para todo tipo de cosas?

Ellos y los intereses que los financian ¿ustedes creen que lo hacen por amor al saber? 

Soberbia que los perderá. "Ahí donde nace el peligro, nace también lo que salva", citaba Heidegger a Hölderling,  en su pregunta por la tecnología.

¿"El mal está a dentro"?

La soberbia pariente cercana de la indiferencia.  La ausencia de cuestionamiento a sus motivos. 

Sus artilugios que los toman en serio, evidentemente. 

El hilo de su poder es el mismo que el de su flaqueza. 

Memoria histórica simple: brillante Leonardo da Vinci es cierto, sin embargo miren sus diseños de artilugios para la guerra. Siempre hay un aforador y quienes se dejan aforar en nombre de “la ciencia”. 

Habrán los ingenuos que vean a un Prometeo pero yo lo que veo es al Mal; no quiero nombrarlo para no inducir un mal-entendido que suba las acciones ya al alza, de los vendedores de fe que participan del convite. 

El caos  implica una lógica no esclarecida. A nuestra incapacidad de explicar la nombramos "caos": lo real como lo imposible de ser simbolizado pero que está ahí como una falta.  

Con Platón digamos:

Quod est videre per speculum in obumbratio.